Mr. Trump spoke at the US Department of Justice on March 14
Magazine Newsweek On March 17 quoted US President Donald Trump as saying that the last minute command of former President Joe Biden was invalid, after the predecessor pardoned members of a committee of the House of Representatives who participated in the investigation of the Capitol Dien Dien on 6.1.2021.
Written on social networks Truth Social on the night of March 16 (US time), Mr. Trump said the Amnesty was invalid because Mr. Biden had signed a auto pen (Autopen).
Therefore, amnesty commands for committee members and many others are considered “invalid, defect and no effect or effect, because they are done in the fact that they are done by Autopen,” he wrote.
“In other words, Mr. Biden did not sign them, but more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The essential amnesty documents were not explained to Mr. Biden or he was approved by him. He did not know anything about them, and those who could have committed a crime,” the White House owner said.
Mr. Trump considered the new entry ban, applied to more than 40 countries?
Later, President Trump said that the committee members investigated the incident, but canceled all the evidence collected in 2 years of “witch hunting” for him and many others, “should fully understand that they face the possibility of being investigated at the highest level.”
Earlier, in the post on social network X on January 20, Mr. Biden announced an amnesty first to the former Anthony Fauci Medical Adviser, former chief of the Council of Chief of the Mark Millley Chief of Staff Mark Millley, and the members, employees and witnesses of the House of Representatives investigating the Capitol Electricity attack on 6.2021.
Mr. Biden said that the above characters were dedicated civil servants for water but were threatened by criminal prosecution.
What is Autopen?
According to the sheet The Economic TimesAutopen is a machine designed to automatically copy hand signatures, often used by politicians, leaders and celebrities to sign a large number of documents. Legal experts often assert the validity of such signatures. However, the specific application of the president’s an automatic pen has not been widely tested in the Court.
