Also Read: ‘Dileep’s allegation that bishop was involved in inciting communal rivalry’; Balachandra Kumar denies the allegation
All that remains is the trial of the investigating officer in the case. Dileep alleged that the government’s request was part of his attempt to avoid a trial.
Also Read: Congress does not have the capacity to lead Badalcheri: Kanaya could have said that yesterday: Binoy Vishwam
Balachandra Kumar is a witness who was hired by the probe team. Balachandra Kumar’s revelations cannot be trusted. The state government also has a ulterior motive to replace the trial judge. In his affidavit, Dileep alleged that the state government had earlier demanded the removal of the judge.
The trial judge should ask for more time. But the judge did not ask for that. In his affidavit, Dileep said that he did not give a definite answer as to why the revelations made by Balachandra Kumar were not made earlier.
In the name of renovation, the locals are in a traffic jam