IndiaCPM says G Sudhakaran failed; What is the action? The...

CPM says G Sudhakaran failed; What is the action? The allegations are as follows


Highlight:

  • Fall in Ambalappuzha during election campaign.
  • There was a fall on the part of G Sudhakaran.
  • Commission of Inquiry Report on the CPM State Committee.

Thiruvananthapuram: The CPM state committee presented the report of the commission of inquiry which found that G Sudhakaran had failed in his campaign activities in Ambalappuzha in the assembly elections. According to the report, Sudhakaran did not work for the victory of candidate H Salam. However, the report does not recommend any action against Sudhakaran.

Will do what is necessary to ensure justice; R Bindu urges Deepa to withdraw from the strike
Mathrubhumi reported that the CPM state secretariat will discuss taking action against Sudhakaran. After that it will be up to you to decide what action to take. Elamaram Kari and KJ Thomas investigated the allegation that Sudhakaran had failed in his election campaign in Ambalapuzha.

The probe against Sudhakaran came after the CPM confirmed that the election campaign in Ambalapuzha had failed. H Salam Sudhakaran, who won from the constituency, was sharply criticized. He had said that Sudhakaran had stayed away from the election campaigns in the constituency.

Church land deal: Relief for Alencherry? Investigation report submitted
This time G Sudhakaran lost his way in Ambalappuzha after the party decided to follow the two term term. It is alleged that he withdrew from the election campaign after the CPM position committee announced H Salam as its candidate. The local leadership of the CPM even worried that the stance of the senior leader would lead to defeat. In Alappuzha, it was alleged at the district committee meeting that G Sudhakaran left when Thomas Isaac was with him all the time in the election campaign and work.

In the first phase, a poster appeared against Salam. Sudhakaran did not respond at this stage. Salam had made it clear that he did not respond even when the propaganda that he was an SDPI member was strong. The district leadership had said that such a response came from the leader who was supposed to lead the campaign in the constituency.

Coming to the south is the Heritage Museum

.