Despite the violation decision of the Constitutional Court regarding Can Atalay, the 3rd Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled not to comply with the violation decision of the Constitutional Court. After the Chamber’s decision, Atalay’s lawyers objected to the decision.
CHAMBER: NO ROOM FOR DECISION MAKING
Evaluating the objection, the 4th Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that there was no need to make a decision on the grounds that there was no issue to be examined.
INVESTIGATION ON THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT CONTINUES
On the other hand, the 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals decided to file a criminal complaint with the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court of Appeals for the necessary assessment and execution of the relevant Constitutional Court members who violated the provisions of the Constitution and illegally exceeded the limits of authority given to them and voted to accept the violation of rights.
It was learned that the Supreme Court of Appeals Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office’s investigation into the criminal complaint continues.
